1966 DKW F 102 vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,323 cc, 2008 Mazda Rustler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda Rustler weights approximately 40 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 DKW F 102 (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 DKW F 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW F 102 | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | F 102 | Rustler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1323 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.6 mm | 71 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 950 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 54 L |
