1966 DKW F 102 vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S60 (240 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW F 102 | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | DKW | Volvo |
| Model | F 102 | S60 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85.6 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
