1966 DKW F 102 vs. 2009 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2009 Renault Symbol is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Symbol is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Symbol (64 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Symbol should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Symbol weights approximately 90 kg more than 1966 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Symbol (160 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm). This means 2009 Renault Symbol will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW F 102 | 2009 Renault Symbol | |
Make | DKW | Renault |
Model | F 102 | Symbol |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 103 Nm | 160 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2473 mm |