1966 DKW F 102 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 222 more horse power than 1966 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW F 102.
Because 2012 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 DKW F 102. (103 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW F 102 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
Make | DKW | Holden |
Model | F 102 | UTE |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 103 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |