1966 DKW Munga vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1966 DKW Munga is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 390 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | DKW | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Munga | 6C |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1938 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 2442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 77 L |
