1966 DKW Munga vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1966 DKW Munga is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | Munga | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |
