1966 DKW Munga vs. 1959 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1966 DKW Munga is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford Fairlane (168 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 984 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 1959 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 5769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2094 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3000 mm |
