1966 DKW Munga vs. 1965 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 1966 DKW Munga is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 340 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Jaguar MK II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 1965 Jaguar MK II | |
| Make | DKW | Jaguar |
| Model | Munga | MK II |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 2483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 63 L |
