1966 DKW Munga vs. 1981 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1981 Holden Commodore is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,142 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Holden Commodore (134 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Holden Commodore weights approximately 240 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 1981 Holden Commodore | |
Make | DKW | Holden |
Model | Munga | Commodore |
Year Released | 1966 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 4142 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |