1966 DKW Munga vs. 1990 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Ford RS 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Ford RS 200 (250 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 1990 Ford RS 200 | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | RS 200 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 54 L |
