1966 DKW Munga vs. 1995 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 100 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 1995 Fiat Bravo | |
| Make | DKW | Fiat |
| Model | Munga | Bravo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1372 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |
