1966 DKW Munga vs. 1995 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 1995 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Pontiac Bonneville (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 450 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Pontiac Bonneville. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 1995 Pontiac Bonneville | |
Make | DKW | Pontiac |
Model | Munga | Bonneville |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |