1966 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1996 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Thunderbird (138 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 510 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 1996 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |