1966 DKW Munga vs. 1998 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1998 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Volkswagen Polo (59 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 90 kg more than 1998 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 1998 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
| Model | Munga | Polo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2410 mm |
