1966 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,970 cc, 2001 Mazda CU-X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda CU-X (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 235 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mazda CU-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Munga | CU-X |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1970 cc |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1345 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 80 L |
