1966 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Rover 25
To start off, 2001 Rover 25 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,119 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rover 25 (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 80 kg more than 2001 Rover 25.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Rover 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2001 Rover 25 | |
Make | DKW | Rover |
Model | Munga | 25 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 1119 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |