1966 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 978 cc (3 cylinders), 1966 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 320 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Mitsubishi eK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | DKW | Mitsubishi |
Model | Munga | eK |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2350 mm |