1966 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2002 Suzuki Covie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki Covie (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Covie should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 360 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki Covie. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
| Make | DKW | Suzuki |
| Model | Munga | Covie |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 2950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 35 L |
