1966 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Ford Ka
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (69 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 148 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2003 Ford Ka | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Ka |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 962 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |
