1966 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2003 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,599 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Mustang (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 357 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Mustang weights approximately 370 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2003 Ford Mustang | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Mustang |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 4599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |