1966 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 602 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2005 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 3932 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1712 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 68 L |