1966 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (73 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 55 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | DKW | Renault |
Model | Munga | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 17.9:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |