1966 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (74 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 125 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | DKW | Renault |
| Model | Munga | Clio |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |
