1966 DKW Munga vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 213 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2006 Rover 75 | |
| Make | DKW | Rover |
| Model | Munga | 75 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 65 L |
