1966 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Bravo (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 325 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2009 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | DKW | Fiat |
Model | Munga | Bravo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 16.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 57 L |