1966 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2009 Ford Explorer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Explorer (211 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 144 kg more than 2009 Ford Explorer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2009 Ford Explorer | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Explorer |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 4009 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 85 L |
