1966 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2010 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Buick LaCrosse (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Buick LaCrosse. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2010 Buick LaCrosse | |
| Make | DKW | Buick |
| Model | Munga | LaCrosse |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5001 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1857 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1504 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2837 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
