1966 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac Escalade (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 289 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1564 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac Escalade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | DKW | Cadillac |
Model | Munga | Escalade |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2674 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5144 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1928 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 98 L |