1966 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac STS (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 702 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Cadillac STS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | DKW | Cadillac |
Model | Munga | STS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2957 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 64 L |