1966 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C3 (72 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 48 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | DKW | Citroen |
| Model | Munga | C3 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 72 HP |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1158 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 45 L |
