1966 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 288 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jeep Commander. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | Munga | Commander |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5650 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3950 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1398 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 80 L |
