1966 DKW Munga vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |