1966 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 156 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2011 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
Model | Munga | Captiva |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 65 L |