1966 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford C-Max (95 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 440 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford C-Max. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | C-Max |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2788 mm |