1966 DKW Munga vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Toyota Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | DKW | Toyota |
| Model | Munga | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 50 L |
