1966 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 595 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
| Model | Munga | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2858 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 71 L |
