1966 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 DKW Munga weights approximately 64 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 DKW Munga | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Munga | 2 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 978 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1046 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2489 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 43 L |
