1966 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,604 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 2604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 64 L |