1966 DKW Munga vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 341 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | Munga | C30 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |