1966 DKW Munga vs. 2013 BMW 3 Series
To start off, 2013 BMW 3 Series is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 BMW 3 Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW 3 Series (296 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW 3 Series should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW 3 Series weights approximately 505 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 BMW 3 Series. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 DKW Munga | 2013 BMW 3 Series | |
Make | DKW | BMW |
Model | Munga | 3 Series |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 978 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.2 :1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1961 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1395 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 61 L |