1966 Ferrari 206 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ferrari 206. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ferrari 206 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 339 more horse power than 1966 Ferrari 206. (217 HP @ 9000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1966 Ferrari 206. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1335 kg more than 1966 Ferrari 206. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ferrari 206 | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Ferrari | Cadillac |
Model | 206 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 556 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 580 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 990 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 68 L |