1966 Ferrari Dino vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ferrari Dino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ferrari Dino would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Ferrari Dino. (177 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1966 Ferrari Dino. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 580 kg more than 1966 Ferrari Dino. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ferrari Dino. (188 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ferrari Dino.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Ferrari Dino | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ferrari | Mitsubishi |
Model | Dino | Colt |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1987 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 255 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1040 kg | 1620 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 95 L |