1966 Fiat 124 vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1966 Fiat 124 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 180 kg more than 1966 Fiat 124.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Fiat 124. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat 124. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1949 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat 124.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Fiat 124 | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
| Make | Fiat | Jeep |
| Model | 124 | CJ2A |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1197 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2040 mm |
