1966 Fiat 124 vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat 124. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat 124 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1966 Fiat 124. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat 124. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 368 kg more than 1966 Fiat 124. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Ranger (250 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat 124. (87 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat 124.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat 124 | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 124 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1197 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 135 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 55 L |