1966 Fiat 2300 vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat 2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat 2300 would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1966 Fiat 2300. (134 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat 2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1078 kg more than 1966 Fiat 2300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat 2300. (179 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat 2300.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat 2300 | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | 2300 | Armada |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2279 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2388 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 106 L |