1966 Fiat 500 vs. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi

To start off, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1966 Fiat 500. (22 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 495 kg more than 1966 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Fiat 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat 500. (36 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat 500.

Compare all specifications: