1966 Fiat Cabriolet vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat Cabriolet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat Cabriolet would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Clio weights approximately 45 kg more than 1966 Fiat Cabriolet.
Because 1966 Fiat Cabriolet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Fiat Cabriolet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Fiat Cabriolet | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Fiat | Renault |
| Model | Cabriolet | Clio |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 50 L |
