1966 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Fiat Campagnola (62 HP) has 9 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Fiat Campagnola should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 640 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Fiat Campagnola | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Fiat | MCC |
| Model | Campagnola | Smart |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
