1966 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 631 kg more than 1966 Fiat Campagnola.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 1966 Fiat Campagnola has manual transmission. 1966 Fiat Campagnola will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat Campagnola | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Campagnola | XC60 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 70 L |