1966 Fiat Coupe vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Fiat Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Fiat Coupe would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1966 Fiat Coupe. (148 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1966 Fiat Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 736 kg more than 1966 Fiat Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Fiat Coupe. (201 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Fiat Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Fiat Coupe | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Coupe | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2279 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 201 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |